Mira Sloane (Sloan)
Character
Her discovery of concealed deletion routines creates an authored crisis of complicity, guilt, and responsibility. This is not a clinical assessment; her routing changes and later disclosures are distinct actions.
Research dossier 11
Whistleblowing, Sabotage & Moral Distress
Separate concepts for discussing disclosure, interference with systems, and distress about perceived moral transgression—with limits on what the cited research establishes.
Reality and fiction, clearly marked. Evidence sections describe the sources; game sections describe authored characters and events. Source-checked does not mean reviewed by a clinician or theologian. Read the evidence-status guide.
RESEARCH NOTES
01 Research question
How can disclosure, interference with systems, and moral distress be discussed without treating them as the same action or a diagnosis?
RESEARCH NOTES
02 Overview
Whistleblowing, sabotage, and moral injury are separate concepts. An ethical conflict, action taken in response to it, and a person’s distress do not automatically establish a clinical condition.
REAL-WORLD · EVIDENCE
03 What the sources address
Litz and colleagues present a preliminary model and intervention strategy concerning moral injury in war veterans. Its military context matters: it is not a direct study of corporate engineers, architects, or whistleblowers. [1]
Miceli and Near’s organizational book addresses whistleblowing as a separate subject. The linked bibliographic record identifies the work; it does not establish a particular psychological outcome in an individual. [2]
RESEARCH NOTES
04 Actions & experiences
Disclosure of perceived wrongdoing and unauthorized interference with a system should be described separately. Moral-injury research offers a lens for discussing perceived transgression and responsibility, not a label that automatically follows from either action.
RESEARCH NOTES
05 Scope & limits
Responses vary widely. A conflict of values does not prove acute moral injury, and neither a fictional scene nor a bibliography substitutes for clinical assessment. Claims about outcomes among corporate whistleblowers require research actually studying that population.
RESEARCH NOTES
06 Reading the sources
The preliminary clinical model and organizational book have different purposes. Keep each source’s scope visible, and distinguish authored motivation from a finding about a studied population.
RESEARCH NOTES
07 Sources & further reading
- Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy
Brett T. Litz and colleagues · 2009 · Clinical Psychology Review 29(8), 695–706
Preliminary military-context model · DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003 - Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees
Marcia P. Miceli & Janet P. Near · 1992 · Lexington Books
Organizational book · Bibliographic record; not a clinical case assessment
RESEARCH NOTES
08 Research record
Adapted from the reviewed Mira Sloane canonical master. Website adaptation: October 24, 2026. Version 1.0. This is educational research for fiction, not a clinical evaluation. Character applications appear separately.
Follow the connection
Found In-Game
Explore each character or card, then follow its research tags back here.